Caveat – This article was inspired by a recent discussion we had with a high school teacher about how students are using AI. The insights shared here specifically apply to youth and teens in grades 8–12. It’s important to note that current generative AI tools explicitly state in their Terms of Service that users must be at least 13 years old. Some, like ChatGPT or GROK, also require parental or legal guardian permission for users under 18. Schools should be aware of these age-gating policies before incorporating AI into classrooms, though this does not apply to teachers using AI independently for instructional purposes.
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in education is rapidly evolving, and today’s students are leveraging it in ways that both support and challenge traditional teaching methods. While some educators may view AI as a threat to their authority or expertise, others recognize its potential to augment learning and create more engaging, personalized educational experiences.
The reality is that teens are increasingly using AI-powered tools such as ChatGPT to refine their writing, summarize complex topics, and generate ideas for projects. Unlike traditional search engines, AI-driven platforms can offer deeper insights, interactive responses, and adaptive feedback. This means students can access explanations in different formats, reinforcing classroom learning rather than bypassing it. AI is being used as a learning assistant by students, and not as a replacement for teachers.
For example, we learned from a student who was struggling with a concept in math who shared with us that they used an AI platform to explain it in a different way, complementing what they learned from their teacher, which helped them to understand the concept. We have also heard from other students how they similarly use AI for language learning, helping them develop stronger writing skills over time.
We understand there is an understandable hesitation among some teachers, particularly those who are less comfortable with technology, about AI’s growing role in education. Many educators recognize the potential benefits of AI in enhancing learning experiences but remain concerned about its unintended consequences. One of the primary fears is plagiarism and academic dishonesty. There is legitimate concern that AI-powered tools make it too easy for students to generate essays or complete assignments without fully engaging with the material. The ability to produce polished responses with minimal effort raises concerns about whether students are truly learning or merely outsourcing their work to technology.
To combat plagiarism and academic dishonesty, teachers can design assignments that require deeper engagement with the material. Instead of traditional essays that AI can easily generate, educators can incorporate oral presentations, in-class discussions, or personal reflections that require students to demonstrate understanding in their own words.
Another significant concern is the potential erosion of critical thinking skills which is backed by some recent research. (1) Critics argue that if students become too reliant on AI-generated answers, they may not develop the ability to analyze information, think independently, or problem-solve effectively. Education is not just about obtaining correct answers but about the process of reasoning, questioning, and refining ideas. If AI provides instant solutions, there is a risk that students may bypass the deeper cognitive engagement necessary for meaningful learning.
To prevent the erosion of critical thinking skills, teachers can use AI as a tool for inquiry rather than simply an answer generator. Educators can encourage students to critically evaluate AI-generated responses, asking them to verify sources, compare multiple perspectives, and refine AI outputs with their own reasoning. Assignments can be structured to require students to explain how they arrived at their conclusions, fostering independent thought while still benefiting from AI’s efficiency. As mentioned in the above noted study:
“In light of these changes, training knowledge workers to think critically when working with GenAI should focus on developing skills in information verification, response integration, and task stewardship. Training programs should emphasize the importance of cross-referencing AI outputs, assessing the relevance and applicability of AI-generated content, and continuously refining and guiding AI processes. Additionally, a focus on maintaining foundational skills in information gathering and problem-solving would help avoid becoming over-reliant on AI”
Another concern, some educators worry about job security in an increasingly AI-driven world. While AI will never replace great teachers, there is anxiety that schools might lean on technology as a cost-cutting measure, reducing the need for human instruction. We believe that teaching is an irreplaceable profession that thrives on personal connections, mentorship, and adaptability, elements that AI cannot replicate. However, the fear persists that administrative decisions could prioritize efficiency over the invaluable human touch that teachers bring to the classroom.
To address job security fears, teachers can embrace AI as a complement rather than a replacement for their role. By integrating AI into lesson planning, grading assistance, and administrative tasks, educators can free up more time for personalized instruction and mentorship. Schools should prioritize professional development opportunities that help teachers become comfortable with AI tools, demonstrating how technology can enhance their work rather than diminish it. Advocating for policies and collective agreements that emphasize the irreplaceable value of educators in student development can also help ensure that AI remains a supportive tool rather than a cost-cutting measure.
While these concerns are understandable, they should not overshadow the immense benefits AI can bring to the classroom when used responsibly. Educators can take proactive steps to address their concerns about AI in education by focusing on strategies that promote responsible and effective integration of technology into the learning process with their students.
We are seeing newer teachers and tech-savvy educators finding innovative ways to integrate AI into their teaching rather than resisting it. Here’s how:
- Encouraging AI as a brainstorming tool: Instead of banning AI-generated content, teachers can ask students to use AI for idea generation but require them to refine and personalize the output.
- Teaching AI literacy: Educators who acknowledge AI’s presence can teach students how to critically evaluate AI-generated responses, differentiating between reliable and unreliable information.
- Using AI for personalized learning: AI-driven tutoring systems can help teachers identify students who need extra support, providing individualized instruction that supplements classroom lessons.
- Creating ethical discussions: AI presents an opportunity to discuss digital ethics, misinformation, and responsible use of technology.
The future of education is not about choosing between AI and traditional teaching methods, but about integrating both in a “balanced” way that enhances learning. While concerns about plagiarism, critical thinking, and job security are an understandable concern, they should not overshadow the potential of AI to be a transformative tool in the classroom when used with intention. By fostering responsible AI use, encouraging students to engage critically with AI-generated content, and using technology to personalize learning experiences, educators can create a balanced approach that prepares students for the evolving digital landscape that is now become ubiquitous in today’s onlife world.
Teachers who embrace AI as a collaborative partner rather than a competitor will be best positioned to guide students in developing the analytical and ethical skills needed to navigate a technology-driven onlife world. Schools must also support educators with professional development, something that is sadly lacking in many schools, and clear guidelines that ensure AI remains an asset rather than a liability.
For parents, caregivers, and educators, the key is to help teens use AI responsibly by reinforcing the importance of critical thinking, curiosity, and ethical digital behaviour. AI is not a replacement for teachers or human learning, it is a tool that, when used thoughtfully and with intention, can deepen understanding, spark innovation, and prepare students for a future where technology is an integral part of their lives. By shifting the conversation from fear to adaptation, we can ensure that AI serves as a force for positive change in education.
AI is not here to replace teachers, it’s here to enhance the learning process. Educators who embrace this shift can better prepare students for a world where AI is an integral and ubiquitous part of their future careers and daily lives.
Digital Food For Thought
The White Hatter
Facts Not Fear, Facts Not Emotions, Enlighten Not Frighten, Know Tech Not No Tech
References:
