Over the past year, the debate around technology use in schools has intensified. Initially focused on the appropriateness of smartphones in educational settings, some groups and individuals are now voicing that they want to expand the conversation to include other digital devices such as iPads and laptops as well.
There is no doubt that the “No Phone in Schools” movement, advocating for restricting or banning smartphones during school hours, has gained traction. However, more recently, some proponents of the “no phone in schools” movement have begun promoting a further shift to a “low tech in school” approach, which seeks to limit or ban all digital devices such as iPads and laptops in the classroom as well. As parents and caregivers, it’s essential to understand the motivations behind this shift, the potential benefits and drawbacks, and how it might impact your child’s education.
Advocates for banning all digital devices, not just phones, in schools argue that minimizing distractions from smartphones, tablets, and laptops can enhance student focus and productivity by reducing diversions from learning activities. They also point out that this approach lowers the chances of students accessing inappropriate content, such as pornography, during school hours. (1)
Proponents of low-tech schools stress the value of direct human interaction, suggesting that excessive screen time can impede the development of essential social skills and interpersonal relationships, which are vital for personal and academic growth. Concerns about digital addiction (2) have prompted supporters to believe that restricting device use in schools can promote healthier screen habits and reduce student’s dependency on technology. Additionally, a low-tech educational environment is seen as beneficial for fostering more hands-on, experiential learning opportunities, encouraging group projects, discussions, and physical experiments, thereby creating a more engaging and interactive learning experience.
However, technology can serve as a powerful educational tool, and banning or restricting devices could limit student’s access to valuable online resources, educational apps, and interactive learning platforms. For instance, laptops provide up-to-date information that can align with the curriculum, eliminating the need for expensive textbook replacements. These technological approaches enable schools to maximize their financial resources while offering students a modern and dynamic learning environment.
Additionally, not all students have equal access to technology at home, and schools often provide essential digital resources that some students might otherwise lack, meaning a low-tech approach could exacerbate these inequalities.
In an increasingly ubiquitous digital society, digital literacy is crucial, and restricting device use in schools might hinder a student’s ability to develop essential digital skills needed for future careers. As well, both students and educators might resist a low-tech approach, especially if they are accustomed to using digital devices as part of their learning routines, making the transition to a low-tech environment challenging and requiring significant adjustments.
However, school administrators need to ensure that all school-issued digital devices, such as iPads or laptops, are equipped with appropriate filters. This is a critical responsibility. These devices, often provided to enhance the learning experience, can also pose risks if not properly filtered and monitored. One of the primary reasons for implementing stringent filters is to protect students from accessing inappropriate content. By blocking access to harmful websites and content, schools create a safer digital environment conducive to learning and personal development.
The implementation of content filters also helps to uphold the school’s duty of care. Schools are entrusted with the responsibility of safeguarding their students, and this extends to the onlife world both on and off campus. Without proper controls, students might inadvertently or deliberately access inappropriate material, which could lead to incidents that the school could be held accountable for. Ensuring that devices are secure from such risks not only protects students, but also shields the school from potential legal and reputational damage.
Filters on school-issued devices encourage responsible digital citizenship. By restricting access to certain types of content, schools can guide students toward appropriate online behavior and usage. This is particularly important in a world where digital literacy is integral to education and future employment. When students are taught to navigate the internet safely and responsibly, they are better prepared for the broader digital world beyond school. This educational approach promotes a balanced, healthy relationship with technology, instilling values that students will carry into adulthood.
The presence of filters on school devices ensures that educational tools are used for their intended purpose. The primary goal of issuing digital devices is to support learning and academic activities. Filters help keep students focused on educational content, reducing distractions from non-educational sites and apps. This focus enhances productivity and ensures that the investment in digital tools yields maximum educational benefits. By fostering a disciplined digital environment, schools can ensure that technology acts as an enabler of learning rather than a source of distraction. Having said all this, it is important to remember that no filter in the world is 100% effective.
As the debate about technology in education continues, finding a balanced approach that considers both its benefits and drawbacks is crucial – this is why ongoing digital literacy education in schools is so important. Parents play a key role in navigating this complex issue by staying informed, communicating with educators, setting healthy screen habits at home, and advocating for flexible policies. Staying informed is essential, digital literacy education is not just for kids – keep up with the latest research and trends in educational technology. Understanding both sides of the argument will help you make informed decisions about your child’s education. (3)
Engage in open dialogue with teachers and school administrators to share your concerns and listen to their perspectives on technology use in the classroom, and what they are doing to minimize risks. This communication can help align home and school expectations regarding digital device usage. At home, encourage responsible and balanced screen use. Establish screen-free times and promote alternative activities that foster creativity and critical thinking. This approach helps children develop a healthy relationship with technology.
Finally, advocate for school policies that strike a balance between utilizing technology for educational purposes and promoting traditional learning methods. Supporting flexible policies allows schools to adapt to the needs of different students and subjects, ensuring a well-rounded educational experience.
The “low tech in school” approach goes beyond cellphones and is a response to concerns about the perceived negative impact all digital devices have on a student’s focus, social skills, and overall well-being. However, it’s essential to consider the potential benefits and drawbacks of such an approach. By staying informed, communicating with educators, and advocating for balanced policies, parents can help ensure that their children receive a well-rounded education that prepares them for both the digital and non-digital aspects of today’s onlife world.
Digital Food For Thought
The White Hatter
Facts Not Fear, Facts Not Feelings, Enlighten Not Frighten, Know Technology vs No Technology!
References:
1/ https://www.commonsense.org/education/articles/how-to-handle-pornography-at-school-and-at-home#:~:text=41%25%20of%20those%20teens%20have,they%20were%2013%20or%20younger.
2/ https://thewhitehatter.ca/blog/parents-caregivers-and-educators-why-we-need-to-move-away-from-the-word-addiction-when-it-comes-to-technology/
3/ https://thewhitehatter.ca/blog/the-one-sided-narrative-on-banning-cellphones-in-schools-what-about-the-missing-research/
