Caveat – this article is a follow up to the one that we posted yesterday “Parenting in the Onlife World – Finding A Balance and Challenging The Myths Between Fear and Opportunity!” (1)
In today’s onlife world, the debate around youth and their use of social media and technology often feels like a battlefield. On one side, we see advocates warning of the perils of screen addiction, mental health crises, and exploitation. On the other side, proponents highlight the incredible opportunities for learning, creativity, and connection. But beneath the surface of these polarizing narratives lies a critical question: “who profits from keeping us so divided?”
When it comes to debates around youth and technology, it’s essential for parents and caregivers to recognize that the polarization of youth and their use of tech often serves as a wedge – not necessarily to help children thrive, but sometimes to drive financial compensation for those amplifying their side of the argument.
Here’s why polarization in this space can be more about profit than the well-being of youth, and how parents and caregivers can navigate this landscape with a balanced perspective.
1. Polarization Fuels Profitable Narratives
Extreme views make for attention-grabbing headlines. Whether it’s dramatic stories about the harms of social media or utopian visions of a tech-driven future, these narratives capture public interest and keep the clicks, shares, and views rolling, which are often monetized.
Organizations, influencers, not-for-profits, and even researchers may unintentionally (or intentionally) lean into these extremes because they drive visibility. In a world where monetization often depends on attention, the loudest voices in the room tend to gain the most financial rewards.
For example:
- Teen tech prohibition messaging can lead to lucrative book deals, speaking engagements, or consulting opportunities. We know of one presenter who, according to the speaker bureau that they work with, charges between $75k – $100K for an in-person presentation. We know another who makes money for providing paid endorsements for software products designed to help parents monitor what their kids are doing on their phones or computers.
- On the other side of the debate, we know of pro-tech advocates who will receive funding from tech companies eager to maintain their market dominance, or to financial benefit from the sales or endorsement of a vendors product.
Neither side is inherently wrong to profit from their expertise or passion, (although we would say a $75k-$100k speaker’s fee is a little over the top) but when the conversation becomes overly polarized, the nuance, and the real needs of parents and children gets lost.
2. Polarization Can Be Used As A Tool For Political Agendas
Polarization around youth and technology isn’t just about financial gain – it’s often used to advance political agendas. Politicians and advocacy groups may leverage emotionally charged narratives about technology to align with their broader ideologies or policy goals.
For instance:
- Calls to ban social media for youth may be framed as a moral imperative to protect children, but they can also serve as a rallying cry for broader efforts to regulate tech companies or restrict individual freedoms.
- On the other side, promoting unrestricted access to technology might align with efforts to prioritize corporate interests, under the guise of encouraging innovation and progress.
This politicization of the debate often leads to black-and-white messaging that appeals to a voter’s emotions, but fails to address the nuanced realities families face. Unfortunately, when youth and their use of technology become a political battleground, meaningful, research-based solutions can get sidelined in favour of soundbites and partisan talking points.
3. Fear Sells Best, and Optimism Is A Close Second
Fear is a powerful motivator, and it’s often used to market products or services or to raise money for a cause. Parents worried about their child’s mental health or online safety may feel compelled to purchase parental control apps, sign up for restrictive programs, donate to not-for-profits that fight online exploitation, or invest in costly seminars that promise to “fix” the problem.
On the flip side, optimism also sells. Companies promoting educational tech tools or social media platforms may overemphasize the benefits while downplaying potential risks, encouraging parents to buy into the belief that more tech equals more success.
The result? – parents and caregivers are left stuck between two extremes, not knowing what to do and spending money on solutions that don’t always address the complexity of their child’s unique needs.
4. Polarization Can Create The Illusion Of Simple Solutions
Polarized debates often present simple solutions to complex problems. “Ban all technology until they’re 16” or “Just teach digital literacy and everything will be fine” are examples of oversimplified approaches that fail to acknowledge the intricacies of youth development and their onlife world.
Organizations or individuals who profit from these narratives may focus on “one-size-fits-all” solutions because they’re easier to market. But the reality is that what works for one family or child may not work for another.
While those promoting polarized views may reap financial or political benefits, the real cost often falls on parents, caregivers, and youth. Families may:
- Waste time and money on programs or tools that don’t deliver meaningful results.
- Feel guilt or shame for not following a particular extreme approach.
- Miss out on the opportunity to teach children balance and critical thinking about technology.
In the end, youth pay the highest price when adults fail to model a balanced, thoughtful approach to technology. They’re either left unprepared for the realities of the onlife world or deprived of its potential benefits.
So how can we as parents and caregivers avoid the polarization trap? Here are some of our thoughts:
Follow the Money
When evaluating claims about youth and technology, ask yourself: Who benefits financially from this perspective? Are they selling a product, service, or ideology? Understanding the incentives behind a message can help you assess its validity.
Seek Balance, Not Extremes
The truth about youth and technology lies somewhere between “ban it all” and “embrace it all.” Focus on creating a family tech strategy that considers your child’s individual needs, strengths, and challenges.
Support Open Dialogue
Foster ongoing conversations about technology use in your home. Create a safe space for your children to share their experiences, ask questions, and voice concerns.
Polarization around youth and technology isn’t just unproductive – it can actively harm the very children we’re trying to protect. By focusing on balanced, evidence-based approaches, parents can cut through the noise and make decisions that truly benefit their families.
Let’s shift the focus from extremes to meaningful conversations that prioritize the well-being of our children. Because at the end of the day, no polarized wedge issue or financial incentive should come before our kids health, happiness, and success in today’s onlife world.
Digital Food For Thought
The White Hatter
Facts Not Fear, Facts Not Emotions, Enlighten Not Frighten, Know Tech Not no Tech
References:
