
In an increasingly connected onlife world, technology can be both a powerful tool for connection and a dangerous weapon for abuse. Over the past several months, we have been working pro bono to assist a client whose ex-spouse has leveraged technology in a campaign of harassment and control. This case has been particularly challenging because the perpetrator operates his own tech company, giving him extensive knowledge of digital exploitation tactics and countermeasures.
For many victims of tech-facilitated abuse, one of the most frustrating aspects is the lack of belief from authorities and even friends and family. Our client was no exception. Despite her repeated claims that her ex-spouse was manipulating her digital environment, law enforcement dismissed her concerns, citing a lack of concrete evidence. Unfortunately, this is a common response. Because tech-facilitated abuse often operates in the shadows, through remote access, spyware, and covert digital manipulation, proving its existence can be difficult.
But now, there is evidence and through our investigation, we uncovered multiple ways her ex-spouse was infiltrating and controlling her digital life, turning what should have been a safe environment into a horror story of surveillance and manipulation.
The scope of the abuse our client endured was absolutely frightening and alarming. Here are some of the key digital attack vectors we identified:
- Spyware on Personal Devices: Our client’s laptop and cellphone had been compromised with covert spyware, granting her ex-spouse remote access to all her data. This included usernames, passwords, emails, messages, and other personal information. This form of digital stalking allowed him to monitor her every move, intercepting communications and eroding any sense of privacy.
- Vehicle Tracking: A program had been installed into her car’s computer system, allowing him to track her location in real-time. This meant he always knew where she was going, which not only increased her fear but also made her feel trapped and constantly watched.
- Home Network and IoT Manipulation: Through access to her home router, the ex-spouse could remotely control critical home systems including security cameras that were suspiciously turned off whenever damage was done to her home or vehicle. He manipulated the heating and air-conditioning, creating physical discomfort and reinforcing his power over her environment. This form of abuse is particularly insidious because it turns the home, a place meant to be a refuge, into a space of anxiety and uncertainty.
Once we identified these vulnerabilities, our priority was to help our client take back control. The strategies implemented included:
- Device Security and Digital Hygiene: all spyware was removed from her laptop and cellphone. Additionally, she was guided on best practices for securing her devices, including using multi-factor authentication, strong password management, and regularly checking for unauthorized applications.
- Securing Her Vehicle: She worked with her automotive dealer to remove the tracking software and ensure that her car’s digital infrastructure was no longer compromised.
- Strengthening Home Network Security: The client replaced her home router with a secure, updated model, changed all passwords, and implemented network monitoring tools to detect unauthorized access. She also disconnected IoT devices that could be controlled remotely and replaced them with non-connected alternatives where possible.
- Legal and Law Enforcement Advocacy: Now armed with concrete evidence, the client was able to present a case to authorities that could no longer be dismissed. This underscores a crucial point: while many tech-facilitated abuse cases go unrecognized, the presence of verifiable evidence shifts the conversation from disbelief to action.
The case of our client serves as a powerful illustration of the evolving nature of domestic abuse in the digital age. As technology becomes more integrated into our daily lives, abusers are finding increasingly sophisticated ways to exert control, often exploiting the very tools designed to enhance convenience and security. Tech-facilitated abuse is insidious, difficult to detect, and frequently dismissed by those who lack the technical expertise to recognize its signs. This lack of awareness can leave victims feeling isolated, powerless, and, most tragically, disbelieved.
However, this case also underscores an important truth: with the right expertise, evidence can be uncovered, and control can be reclaimed. By identifying the specific digital attack vectors used against our client such as spyware, vehicle tracking, and home network manipulation, we were able to help her regain autonomy over her digital and physical world. The strategies implemented, from forensic analysis to enhanced security measures, not only provided her with immediate protection but also empowered her with the knowledge needed to safeguard herself in the future.
Perhaps the most critical takeaway from this case is the need for systemic change. Law enforcement, legal professionals, and support networks must recognize that tech-facilitated abuse is not science fiction, it is a very real and very dangerous form of coercion and control. Dismissing victims due to a lack of immediate, tangible evidence only allows abusers to continue their campaigns unchecked. This case demonstrates that when digital forensics are applied, when victims are given the tools and knowledge to fight back, and when authorities take these cases seriously, justice is possible.
Moving forward, there must be greater awareness, education, and resources dedicated to addressing tech-facilitated abuse. Victims need access to digital security specialists, law enforcement must be trained to recognize and investigate these forms of harassment, and the legal system must evolve to hold perpetrators accountable. Until these steps are taken, too many victims will continue to suffer in silence, trapped in a digital prison that no one else can see. The BC Society of Transition Houses has some great resources that can help (1)
This case is a call to action. We must listen to victims and survivors of this type of tech based crime, believe their experiences, and take the necessary steps to ensure that technology is used for empowerment and not control.
Technology should empower, not imprison. As digital threats evolve, so too must our understanding of abuse and harassment in the modern age. This case serves as a powerful example of how vigilance, expertise, and persistence can help victims reclaim their digital autonomy.
By raising awareness and providing resources, we can help others recognize the signs of tech-facilitated abuse and take proactive steps to protect themselves. No one should have to live in fear of the technology meant to enhance their lives.
Related Article
Digital Food For Thought
The White Hatter
Facts Not Fear, Facts Not Emotions, Enlighten Not Frighten, Know Tech Not No Tech
References: